Review Process Underway at WV-DEP, Air Quality Division until July 27, 2023
Appreciation goes to the Staff of the WV-DEP for the open question and public comment sessions July 20th on the proposed Medical Waste gasifier/incinerator to be sited in Jackson County. As all the questions indicated, this proposal is hardly understood at all! Most important were the questions and comments of Mr. Buckley from Jackson County. The residents there not only lack understanding, they are not even aware!
A schematic diagram or flow sheet was promised to Mr. Buckley, which I also ask about during the question session. I also stated that the Application Document for this project that is on the WV-DEP website was 1974 pages in size when I tried to use it. (It apparently has been growing in size as time passes.) This document is too large. I was unable to fully load or navigate in it beyond page 38.
1. Please decompose the Application Document and designate one component (separate document) as The Application Document. Then, the other supporting documents or separate appendices will be supplements. Please forward these ASAP to the participants and any others that may be considered party to this matter.
2. Please obtain or prepare a reasonable process flow sheet showing some technical detail and email these to Mr. Buckley, Mr. Nichols (this writer), and the other participants. Be sure to indicate the By-Pass feature, its input and exit. And, indicate the continuous emission monitoring (CEM) locations and flare locations, if any.
3. Please consider holding a Public Event in Jackson County in mid-September on this Application. The hot months of the vacation season are to be avoided. The local residents there deserve to become informed of this proposed 20 ton per day facility involving unusually noxious materials. Such a Public Meeting was held in Follansbee, WV, regarding a similar size waste incinerator. (Have you estimated the TPD of GHG?)
4. Additional justification for the above requests is the unusually complex if not complicated nature of the process, of the control system and of the draft Air Quality Permit itself. Most commentors noted this as well as the complex data stream that will result. Generally, it was noted that the draft Permit is far too lenient in its time periods and deadlines, given the toxic substances that can escape to the local environment. Providing the operators 15 days to fix any specific leak, is just one example.
>> Submitted to WV-DEP, July 21, 2023, Duane Nichols, Nichols330@gmail.com
#######+++++++#######+++++++########
YOUTUBE VIDEO AVAILABLE: VIRTUAL PUBLIC HEARING ON AIR QUALITY PERMIT FOR THUNDER MOUNTAIN GASIFIER SYSTEM, WV-DEP, JULY 20, 2023
{ 1 comment… read it below or add one }
Ravenswood community has mixed thoughts on potential waste-to-energy facility
From Jordan Mead, WOWK, News 13, Jul 21, 2023 / 08:09 PM EDT
JACKSON COUNTY, WV (WOWK) – A proposed waste-to-energy facility may be coming to the city of Ravenswood in Jackson County. This proposed facility’s future depends on if the company leading this construction gets their application approved by the West Virginia Department of Environmental Protection.
The company is Thunder Mountain Environmental Services LLC., and their proposed facility would take medical waste and convert it into energy.
“The facility is proposing to accept certain medical waste, shred it, and then convert it to energy using gasification. Gasification is the process of converting waste into a gaseous product (called syngas) by exposure to high temperatures in the presence of oxygen or steam,” DEP Chief Communications Officer Terry Fletcher said. “Syngas is primarily composed of carbon dioxide, hydrogen and carbon monoxide and can be burned as fuel or further refined to a liquid fuel.”
The facility will only be built and begin this process if their permit is approved by the West Virginia DEP.
The medical waste used to create this energy would include items such as used needles, blood, pharmaceuticals and more.
On Thursday evening, June 20, the DEP hosted a virtual public hearing, some guests expressed their questions and concerns about Thunder Mountain’s proposal.
“I would say we should move forward with an abundance of caution. These facilities are very new,” Ohio River Coordinator with West Virginia Rivers Heather Sprouse said.
Sprouse attended the virtual public hearing on Thursday.
“We’re not really clear on what the long term health impacts could be, especially in a cumulative sense. There are already a number of permitted polluting facilities all along the Ohio River. So, the Ohio River Valley faces these cumulative impacts which really places a strong burden on these communities,” Sprouse said.
Some residents of Ravenswood also expressed a mix of emotions about this facility.
“We have a lot of disposal problems getting rid of it all. It doesn’t break down rapidly in landfills for the most part. it would be wonderful to see that repurposed, recycled that it would make for a better environment and a better economy for people around this area,” Martha Snyder said. “There is a lot of industry possibilities along that road. Yes, I think it would be an advantage for all of us.”
Others said a facility along Point Pleasant Road would disrupt their peace.
“If you bring a facility like this out here, where is the wildlife going to be pushed? You push the wildlife out of their homes,” Jackson County resident Bruce Gunnoe said. “My concern is a lot of people move from the city, come out here in the country life, get away from all the noise in the city, out here in the peace and quiet. This is a place where they would like to retire. This medical facility or whatever it is going up out here, I think is just ruining the quiet life of living.”
The DEP’s Division of Air Quality will still be taking public comments until 5 p.m. next Thursday, July 27. All public comments will be factored into the final decision to either approve or reject the thunder mountain’s air quality permit.