Shell ethane cracker polyethylene facility in Ohio River valley of southwestern PA
From the Staff, Youngstown Business Journal, June 15, 2020
PITTSBURGH, Pa. – A group of economists and engineers from seven universities in West Virginia, Ohio and Pennsylvania, including Ted Boettner and John Russo, have published a letter sent to the governors of these states warning that the projected impact of the petrochemical industry won’t be as great as initially thought.
The letter follows a recent report by Institute for Energy Economics and Financial Analysis stating the Royal Dutch Shell ethane cracker plant in Monaca, Pa., “faces a combination of risks that weaken its anticipated financial performance.” Among the risks cited by the analysis group are overall economic uncertainty; the number of similar plants built worldwide, leading to a potential oversupply of ethane crackers and plastics manufacturing; and the decreasing price of plastics.
A similar report was released by the institute in regards to the proposed PTT Global Chemical cracker plant in Belmont County. A final investment decision on that project has been delayed indefinitely.
“We also see additional economic and technological barriers, which are likely to outlast the current economic crisis and make the construction of more crackers in the Ohio Valley and southwestern Pennsylvania highly unlikely,” the group writes. “Consequently, projects that depend on a build-out of four to five crackers, including development of large natural gas liquids storage facilities such as the proposed [Appalachian Storage Hub] and a major expansion of the downstream plastics manufacturing sector, are also unlikely to be realized as are the jobs they are expected to provide.”
Signing the letter are Ted Boettner, executive director of the West Virginia Center of Budget and Policy; University of Akron economics professor Amanda Weinstein; James Van Nostrand, professor at the West Virginia College of Law and director of the Center for Energy and Sustainable Development; Bethany College economics professor Wilfrid Csaplar Jr.; Nicholas Muller, professor of economics, engineering and public policy at Carnegie Mellon University; Mark Partridge, professor at chairman of Rural-Urban Policy at Ohio State University and John Russo, founder and former director of the Center for Working Class Studies at Youngstown State University.
The group cited the cancellation of the Ascent ethane cracker plant in West Virginia, the indefinite postponement of the PTT cracker plant in Belmont County, Ohio, and the failure of China to follow through on an announced $84 billion investment in the region as signs that interest in such developments in the region are fading, while interest in other parts of the world are increasing.
In urging leaders to move away from focusing on petrochemical projects, the group also pointed to technological barriers, environmental concerns and health considerations.
“In addition to being major emitters of greenhouse gases, ethane cracker plants, processing facilities, and downstream manufacturers are also emitters of fine particulate matter as well as volatile organic compounds,” the letter said. “Residents in our region already suffer higher than average rates of cancer, cardiovascular disease, upper respiratory disease, obesity, diabetes, and other conditions that make our region’s population among the nation’s most vulnerable to adverse health consequences from these substances.”
The group urged the governors of Ohio, Pennsylvania and West Virginia to instead direct more attention at renewable energy sources, such as solar power.
“The clean energy economy offers large-scale, high-visibility opportunities, like the Lordstown Motors electric truck plant in Ohio as well as new opportunities for existing businesses in communities all over our region in fields like lighting, HVAC, construction, building maintenance, and energy efficiency retrofits,” the letter said. “The construction of high-efficiency buildings and the retrofitting of existing buildings and homes generates knock-on benefits, including reduced demand for electricity, lower utility bills for ratepayers, greater comfort for workers and residents, and fewer greenhouse gas emissions.”
Point Your RSS Reader to FrackCheckWV.net/feed/
{ 2 comments… read them below or add one }
The full open letter to three governors is shown below:
Dear Governors DeWine, Wolf and Justice
In Ohio, Pennsylvania, and West Virginia, our goals for economic growth and job creation are being undermined by the mistaken belief that the region’s petrochemical and plastics manufacturing industries are poised to greatly expand and, in the process, generate large numbers of new jobs. In fact, no such expansion and jobs boom is likely. And, unless we adopt new and better development strategies, we risk squandering hundreds of millions of dollars in public funds in pursuit of a vision that will not materialize.
The recent cancellation of the ASCENT ethane cracker in Wood County, West Virginia, the indefinite postponement of a final investment decision on the proposed Belmont County, Ohio cracker, the failure of the proposed Appalachian Storage Hub (ASH) to attract private investors, and the failure by China to follow through on an announced investment of $84 billion in in the region are just the most visible signs that the vision of an economic renaissance driven by an expansion of petrochemicals and plastics manufacturing is an economic non-starter.
That is why we — a group of economists, engineers, public policy analysts, and former policymakers who are affiliated with some of the region’s leading institutions – have concluded that regional leaders need to explore more feasible and sustainable economic development strategies. Some of the reasons are contained in a recent study from the Institute for Energy Economics and Financial Analysis (IEEFA), which determined that a proposed cracker in Belmont County, Ohio has become too risky an investment to go forward. IEEFA has been joined in that conclusion by Moody’s, Fitch’s, and IHS Markit.
We also see additional economic and technological barriers, which are likely to outlast the current economic crisis and make the construction of more crackers in the Ohio Valley and Southwestern Pennsylvania highly unlikely. Consequently, projects that depend on a buildout of four to five crackers, including development of large natural gas liquids storage facilities such as the proposed ASH and a major expansion of the downstream plastics manufacturing sector, are also unlikely to be realized as are the jobs they are expected to provide.
At the same time that prospects in our region are dwindling, competition is growing rapidly elsewhere. In just the past two years, ethylene and polyethylene production capacity in the US has increased by 50 percent, principally along the Gulf Coast, creating a condition of oversupply that the IEEFA analysis doesn’t see closing until 2026. The global buildout is even greater, with Wood Mackenzie forecasting a “meteoric expansion” of ethylene capacity in China over the next five years. As a result, IHS Markit forecasts an imminent plunge in global cracker utilization rates. Another discouraging factor is that, even before the recent coronavirus crisis and the associated economic slowdown, the financial condition of the region’s gas drilling industry was dire. And the best cure for the industry’s condition – a rise in natural gas prices – would further reduce the competitiveness of petrochemicals from the region by driving up the cost of the ethane feedstocks. Additional barriers are presented by questions about the speed of general economic recovery and whether global and domestic demand for plastics and chemicals will meet pre-crisis expectations.
These are just the economic conditions that are creating intolerable risks for prospective investors. There are additional factors as well. Petrochemical and plastics manufacturing are emissions-intensive activities that are vulnerable to government actions to reduce greenhouse gases, such as carbon taxes and caps, for which pressure is growing in the United States and globally. At the same time, the pace of growth in the plastics market is being thrown into question as national, regional, and local governments, including recently China, enact measures designed to reduce plastics consumption and pollution.
Meanwhile, the vision of our region becoming a petrochemical hub comparable to the Gulf Coast also faces severe technological challenges. Ethane from the Marcellus/Utica fields does not contain aromatics and other chemicals, which are essential components in the manufacture of many products. Most of the ethylene and polyethylene produced in this region is, therefore, likely to be shipped elsewhere – primarily China — for manufacturing, which severely undercuts prospects for manufacturing job growth here.
Finally, health and environmental risks associated with a petrochemical buildout, can’t be overlooked. In addition to being major emitters of greenhouse gases, ethane cracker plants, processing facilities, and downstream manufacturers are also emitters of fine particulate matter as well as volatile organic compounds (VOCs). Residents in our region already suffer higher than average rates of cancer, cardiovascular disease, upper respiratory disease, obesity, diabetes, and other conditions that make our region’s population among the nation’s most vulnerable to adverse health consequences from these substances.
For these many economic, technological, environmental, and health reasons, we believe our states need more viable, just, and sustainable development strategies that create jobs and provide the tools and resources needed by workers and communities, especially those that have been disproportionately affected by deindustrialization, to successfully transition. One area of special promise is the clean energy economy – electric vehicles, energy storage, wind power, solar power, and energy efficiency — which already employs more than 175,000 workers in Ohio, Pennsylvania, and West Virginia, three quarters of them in manufacturing and construction.
The clean energy economy offers large-scale, high-visibility opportunities, like the Lordstown Motors electric truck plant in Ohio as well as new opportunities for existing businesses in communities all over our region in fields like lighting, HVAC, construction, building maintenance, and energy efficiency retrofits. The construction of high-efficiency buildings and the retrofitting of existing buildings and homes generates knock-on benefits, including reduced demand for electricity, lower utility bills for ratepayers, greater comfort for workers and residents, and fewer greenhouse gas emissions.
We ask you to help stop the squandering of public funds and resources in pursuit of an imagined petrochemical boom. Instead our region’s efforts should be focused on alternative economic development strategies, which can attract new businesses and expand opportunities for existing ones while creating new jobs up and down the skills ladder in communities throughout our region. Thank you for your consideration.
Pictured at top: An aerial view of the Royal Dutch Shell ethane cracker plant under construction in Monaca, Pa.
Source: The Business Journal, Youngstown, Ohio.
https://www.theintelligencer.net/news/top-headlines/2020/06/letter-to-governors-questions-economic-impact-of-cracker-plants/
Letter to Governors Questions Economic Impact of Cracker Plants
By RICK SHRUM, Wheeling Intelligencer, June 16, 2020
(PTT-DLM still plans to build a cracker plant in Dilles Bottom, Ohio, but that endeavor is on hold after the company postponed a final investment decision.)
WHEELING — The prospect of a petrochemical buildout in the Ohio River Valley was already a divisive issue. It was ballyhooed by some as an economic generator and decried by others for greenhouse gas emissions.
That scenario became a bit more polarizing Monday when it got a resounding thumb’s down on economics.
Lacking a formal name but not a purpose, a group of economists and engineers sent letters to the governors of Pennsylvania (Tom Wolf), West Virginia (Jim Justice) and Ohio (Mike DeWine). Organizers, according to an emailed news release, said Monday the tri-state region is “not likely” to experience a major buildout or “the kind of job creation that some predict.”
The letter was cobbled together by eight college-affiliated economists and engineers and John Hanger, former head of the state Department of Environmental Protection. The missive also was distributed to the media, and it begins: “In Ohio, Pennsylvania and West Virginia, our goals for economic growth and job creation are being undermined by the mistaken belief that the region’s petrochemical and plastics manufacturing industries are poised to greatly expand and, in the process, generate large numbers of new jobs.
“In fact, no such expansion and jobs boom is likely. And, unless we adopt new and better development strategies, we risk squandering hundreds of millions of dollars in public funds in pursuit of a vision that will not materialize.”
Construction of an ethane cracker plant is well underway in Potter Township, Beaver County, Pa., a facility Shell Chemical Appalachia is erecting along the Ohio River. Production resumed six weeks ago following a shutdown due to the COVID-19 pandemic.
Two other petrochemical complexes had been discussed for the valley, until the ASCENT project in Wood County, W.Va., was canceled last summer. PTT-DLM still plans to build a cracker in Dilles Bottom, Ohio, but that endeavor is on hold after the company postponed a final investment decision.
Sean O’Leary, a Wheeling native, organized the letter campaign. He describes himself “as an energy analyst type of guy” who has a keen interest in this.
“You have folks who say this is an immense jobs creator and you have the opposing environmental perspective,” he said. “What’s left out is the fact that economics don’t support this. Even if jobs and economic growth were the objective, this is not the way to go there.
“It’s extremely unlikely we’d see the job growth proclaimed by (petrochemical) proponents. We had the sense that anyone who looked at the numbers would come to this conclusion.”
Hanger, the former DEP secretary and current national energy analyst, said in a statement: “Claims that the petrochemical industry will revitalize Western Pennsylvania and its neighbors give people false hope that cruelly build only disappointment and frustration. Fortunately, there is powerful economic development alternative: retrofitting buildings for energy efficiency, building electric vehicles and their parts, as well as manufacturing and installing wind, solar and battery storage.”
James Van Nostrand, director of the Center for Energy and Sustainable Development at West Virginia University’s College of Law, also weighed in. The professor said: “It’s time for the region to stop staking its future on fossil fuels, which has no future.
“The fastest growing sector of the economy is clean energy – energy efficiency and renewables. The region’s efforts are better directed toward establishing policies that attract clean energy investments as well as the large employers who increasingly demand renewable sources of electricity for their energy needs.”
Petrochemical Industry has its supporters as well.
Mike Chadsey, director of public relations with the Ohio Oil and Gas Association, called it a “one-sided” and short-sighted view as the price of plastics are expected to increase in the future.
“We disagree with that letter,” Chadsey said. “It’s clear that the folks who wrote the letter don’t really understand the oil and gas industry, surely don’t understand the petrochemical industry. They don’t understand prices and the long-term view of the industry.
Dan Williamson, a spokesman for PTT-DLM, said in a statement: “The proposed petrochemical complex (in Belmont County) would be a multibillion-dollar investment that would yield a positive economic impact for generations to come. The project is supported by trade unions, economic development advocates and elected officials from both political parties.”
Tom Westfall, president of the West Virginia Oil and Natural Gas Association, said in a statement: “Natural gas is clean-burning, cost effective and dependable. Its byproducts are critical to everyday life. The industry employs thousands, and its economic impact is huge. Growing the industry means growing the region’s future and moving toward sustained prosperity.
“That includes expanding the petrochemical industry in this region. Cracker plants would bring much needed jobs and tax revenue, and those plants would use our product. We’re natural partners. The economic multipliers would be significant.”