From an Article by the MetroNews Staff, June 22, 2018
CHARLESTON, W.Va. — A federal court issued a stay Thursday on a streamlined river crossing permit related to the Mountain Valley Pipeline.
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit put a hold on a permit from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. The permit included a provision stating crossings of the Elk, Gauley, Greenbrier and Meadow rivers had to be completed within 72 hours. The project’s developers said it would take between four and six weeks for work to be completed.
The 304-mile pipeline will deliver natural gas from Wetzel County to market in Virginia.
Sierra Club Beyond Dirty Fuels Campaign Director Kelly Martin said the related permit, “nationwide permit 12,” was not the best option.
“Today’s decision shows once again that the Nationwide Permit 12 cannot be used as a one size fits all approach for dirty and dangerous pipelines that pose serious threats to our communities and clean water,” she said. “Construction on the Mountain Valley Pipeline must be halted immediately as the case to protect our water and communities proceeds.”
West Virginia Rivers Coalition Executive Director Angie Rosser said the stay brings a “sense of relief.”
“What we’re seeing is that short-cuts and easy-outs just won’t work for this massive project. Already with MVP, we’re seeing its early construction causing problems for our waters,” she said. “It’s encouraging that the court agrees a more intensive review of this permit is required before risking any further damage.”
Gov. Jim Justice issued a statement Thursday night, saying his office will continue to monitor related proceedings.
“This project represents thousands of jobs and millions of dollars being spent to benefit this state, not to mention the long-term stability and boost the energy economy of this country will see as a result of this project’s completion,” he said.
Photo in the Article shows a stick in the ground which designates the proposed path of the Mountain Valley Pipeline across the property owned by Mark Jarrell in Summers County.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
US 4th Circuit Issues Stay on MVP Stream Crossings in WV
From an Update by POWHR, Protect Our Water, Heritage & Rights, June 21, 2018
The U.S. 4th Circuit Court of Appeals granted a motion for stay on all stream crossing construction in the Huntington District of West Virginia June 21. The order was issued as part of the challenge to the use of the Army Corps of Engineers Nationwide 12 Permit along the Mountain Valley Pipeline. The original Motion for Stay was filed May 22.
In the lawsuit, environmental organizations — specifically Sierra Club, Appalachian Voices, Chesapeake Climate Action Network, and West Virginia Rivers Coalition — are asserting that the Army Corps Nationwide 12 permit cannot be applied to the Elk, Greenbrier, Gauley, and Meadow Rivers in West Virginia because the pipeline cannot cross those streams within the WV required limit of 72 hours. The Corps conceded that fact and partially suspended the permit for just those four crossings.
Attorneys with Appalachian Mountain Advocates, who are working on behalf of the environmental groups, are arguing that because the permit cannot be applied to four crossings along the route, the entire permit must be suspended until the court reviews it.
“Today’s decision shows once again that the Nationwide Permit 12 cannot be used as a one size fits all approach for dirty and dangerous pipelines that pose serious threats to our communities and clean water,” the Sierra Club’s Beyond Dirty Fuels Campaign Director Kelly Martin said in a press statement. “Construction on the Mountain Valley Pipeline must be halted immediately as the case to protect our water and communities proceeds.”
“Today’s decision by the 4th Circuit of the US Court of Appeals is very welcome,” Maury Johnson of Preserve Monroe and POWHR said. “I believe that the US Army Corp of Engineers made grievous errors in issuing their NWP 12 Certification for this disastrous project. I hope my neighbors in Virginia, namely the VA DEQ and the VA State Water Control Board, will not make the same mistake.”
“It brings a sense of relief to see this pause button hit,” WV Rivers Coalition Executive Director Angie Rosser said in a press statement. “What we’re seeing is that short-cuts and easy-outs just won’t work for this massive project. Already with MVP, we’re seeing its early construction causing problems for our waters. It’s encouraging that the court agrees a more intensive review of this permit is required before risking any further damage.”
{ 3 comments… read them below or add one }
Federal Court Halts Mountain Valley Pipeline
From the West Virginia Rivers Coalition, June 27, 2018
The news broke over the weekend that a federal court approved our motion to “stay”, or put a halt to, construction across 591 stream crossings by the Mountain Valley Pipeline (MVP) in West Virginia. This action is in response to a challenge filed by Appalachian Mountain Advocates on behalf of West Virginia Rivers, Sierra Club, Indian Creek Watershed Association, Appalachian Voices and the Chesapeake Climate Action Network to suspend an unlawful permit.
The permit, known as the Nationwide 12 administered by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, deals with dredge and fill approvals of rivers and streams crossings. Being a “nationwide” permit, it treats all crossings as “one size fits all” versus analyzing each crossing individually. The court’s ruling signals that MVP is ineligible for the Nationwide 12 permit.
Five Facts on the Mountain Valley Pipeline Stream Crossing Stay
Permit Ineligibility. The Fourth Circuit Court issued the stay because of issues related to the time MVP said it would take to complete river crossings. In our court challenge, we found that the MVP would not be in compliance with timeline requirements stipulated by the Nationwide 12 permit.
Four Rivers. Our challenge specifically pointed out the crossings of the Gauley, Elk, Greenbrier and Meadow Rivers. The Nationwide 12 requires these crossings be completed within 72-hours. However, we discovered that MVP says the crossings of these four rivers would take 4-6 weeks.
591 stream crossings. The court’s decision suspends any construction on 591 total streams in WV. Because the 4 rivers cannot meet the Nationwide 12 permit conditions, now the Nationwide 12 cannot be used for any of the crossings by this pipeline. MVP will likely need to apply for an individual permit for their stream crossings, a process that could take many months.
Violations. Just days before the court’s decision, WVDEP issued two water pollution violation notices for the Mountain Valley Pipeline. In all, MVP has been cited four times for failure to protect water quality.
Atlantic Coast Pipeline. The Mountain Valley Pipeline isn’t alone in its permit inadequacies. WV Rivers and partners sent a letter to the Army Corps of Engineers requesting a re-evaluation of the Atlantic Coast Pipeline’s Nationwide 12.
As this story continues to develop WV Rivers will keep you updated! Be sure to “like” WV Rivers on Facebook for breaking news and actions you can take to protect our water.
West Virginia Rivers Coalition
3501 MacCorkle Ave SE #129
Charleston, WV 25304
Hi all –
The filing by Appalmad yesterday to stay MVP in Virginia mirrors the one filed in WV, and which the 4th Circuit ruled on our side last week. So… fingers crossed for the same result.
Go, Appalmad, go!
https://www.roanoke.com/news/local/mountain-valley-pipeline-foes-file-new-legal-challenge-following-last/article_fa8b993f-57b3-5280-ac4c-d739eef0e341.html
https://www.wvgazettemail.com/news/cops_and_courts/mountain-valley-pipeline-construction-should-be-stopped-in-virginia-too/article_eb1c32d0-1856-5b80-85ce-362d513661ff.html
Cat McCue / Communications Director / Appalachian Voices
cat@appvoices.org / w. 434-293-6373 / c. 434-953-8672
Press releases | Front Porch Blog | The Appalachian Voice
Mountain Valley Pipeline (MVP) problems continue
From the Virginia Mercury News, July 23, 2018
Regulators in West Virginia issued their sixth violation against the Mountain Valley Pipeline for allowing muddy runoff to flow from construction sites, reports Laurence Hammack at The Roanoke Times.
Opponents of the project, including a former DEQ regulator, called the repeated failures “pretty extraordinary,” according to the paper. The company has said it’s working to improve erosion controls.
Runoff can contaminate wells and other water supplies.
The Times also has a new photo gallery showing the progress of construction in Roanoke, Franklin and Montgomery counties.